Advertisement
 

The Church and the Purple Pen

 

Mar 30, 2008

When I was in the corporate world, my boss would sometimes jokingly use a purple pen to review my work.  He was poking fun at the fact that some school systems think red might be took offensive of a color with which to grade. 

 Such is our culture.

 We hate to tell others that they are failing in a certain area.  We don’t want our children to experience the pain of being below average.  Indeed, most good parents want nothing more than their children to excel.  This attitude is noble, but when school systems begin to remove the “F” then the “D,” and with at least one school system in the South, the “C,” it only makes me wonder if such an extreme is healthy.

Admittedly, I am not an expert on school health.  But a trend is evident within our society - people don’t like to broach the subject of failure.  I can certainly understand; failure is my biggest fear.

A recent study in the Wall Street Journal revealed that corporate America is now lessening the taboo on crying at work.  Now I am not talking about the sudden and tragic news that people hear at work, such as losing a loved one, which causes them to cry.  This study involved those who received negative feedback and burst into tears.

Who concerns me is that my generation of 20 and 30-somethings are perhaps getting too sensitive about life, particularly failure.  The question that I have is how it carries over into the church.  Quite frankly, I don’t like telling the unmarried couple who are living together that what they are doing is wrong in the eyes of God.  I don’t like dealing with people who are ingrained in sin, having to tell them that they need a gut-check from God.  I don’t like hearing warranted criticism about my pastoral ministry.  But in the end, it is healthy.

What if my father and mother had never told me that 50% on a test is not like batting .500?  What if they never let me know that I had failed?  I would never have learned to deal with not meeting expectations.

This level of lowered expectations certainly had crept into the corporate world, as evidenced by more people my age crying at work.  My former boss, though being humorous with the purple pen, is not too far off after all.

The church is no doubt different from the corporate world.  It is a place of healing, a place to cry if need be, and a place to weep over sins.  But it is not a place where we can tolerate failure to the red words in our Bibles.  As a pastor, I hope and pray my church raises the bar of expectations.  I certainly do not want to lower the standards so that others will feel good about themselves.  Granted, everyone is at a different stage of spiritual maturity. 

Okay, so I am hoping that this will somewhat be an interactive article.  What do you think?  Should churches be preparing warriors or weaklings?  How far is too far with what to expect from church members and potential church members?  It is a tough subject, but I would love to hear your thoughts.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Author: Sam Rainer
Bio: Sam serves the church as a pastor, writer, and researcher. He is president and CEO of Rainer Research, a firm dedicated to providing answers for better church health.

COMMENTS »

On Apr 3, 2008, David Rainer said:

I’ve got to vote for Warriors. I think discernment plays a large role in the “how far is too far” & the reality you mentioned that different folks are in different stages, but I think a starting place has to be having some type of membership class in order to join the church so that everyone is on the same page in terms of what the church is & what is expected at the very minimum in order to be a member. That way, there can be some sort of common understanding between leadership & laity about what the Word requires for a Christian to be.




On Apr 6, 2008, dskies said:

hmmmm. warriors or weaklings? is this a trick question? there is no doubt a need to be sensative to each individual’s situation b/c, let’s face it, not everyone has the same background/experiences. sure, the bar should be high, but there should also be a sense of safety to the member so that if they fall (as we all do) they know that they can turn to the church instead of hiding from it.




On Jun 27, 2008, maryvezendy said:

I think this is a very delicate subject. I think there should be a “grace” period for people when they become Christians. I think that truth should be spoken in love to them first and then little by little the love should become tougher and tougher, all the while telling them that their sins are forgiven through the blood of Jesus but they must have a true, repentant heart…and repent means to turn away from.

Before I got saved I didn’t understand the concept of Jesus since I thought it mean that we could just go out and live it up and repent later and it would all be okay. When I realized that didn’t work and that I needed to turn my life over to Him it was the hardest but best day of my life. People were gracious with me, as I will be with others…all the while lovingly speaking the truth of Jesus to them.

Praise to our Lord, Jesus Christ…the only way!




» RSS feed for comments on this post.
» TrackBack URL


Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

Advertisement

 
Advertise     About Us     Contact Us